Evaluating the ‘Red-Green Alliance’ 

A Hebraic-Covenantal and Divine Council Critique

Today, as I write these words, it is less than six weeks since the Makerfield Bye-Election (June 2026). During that time we have witnessed the completion of a Labour coup against Keir Starmer, an attempted Establishment take-down of Nigel Farage, and the brutal death of Anne Widdecombe, complete with the now mandatory left-wing vitriol. It always strikes me as ironic that the people who preach tolerance so ardently are completely intolerant of anyone who disagrees with their perspective.

​Framing the Conversation

Maybe we shouldn’t be totally surprised. While the term ‘green’ is normally used in politics to denote environmentalist concerns and the Green Party, in recent years, the phrase ‘Red-Green Alliance’ has been increasingly used by commentators to describe a perceived convergence between segments of the political left (‘red’) and Islamic movements (‘green’), many of whom also have highly dubious ties to the Green party.

The term ‘Red-Green Alliance’ itself is debated and often employed polemically, so it requires careful and responsible handling.

Our goal is not political alignment, but biblical clarity, spiritual discernment, and faithful witness.

As Christians, our task is neither to caricature nor to inflame, but to discern. We are called to, “test all things; hold fast what is good”. (1 Thess 5:21). This article approaches the topic through two theological lenses: -

1. The Hebraic Covenant Framework: Emphasising God’s unfolding redemptive plan through covenant.
2. The Divine Council Worldview: Recognising the spiritual realities behind earthly systems and nations.

Our goal is not political alignment, but biblical clarity, spiritual discernment, and faithful witness.

The Hebraic Covenant: Foundations for Discernment

Scripture unfolds through covenants, divinely initiated relationships grounded in promise, law and faithfulness. Key covenants include the Abrahamic (Gen 12:1-3); Mosaic (Ex 19–24); Davidic (2 Sam 7); and new covenant (Jer 31:31-34 & Luke 22:20).

Central to these is God’s character, as demonstrated in the Hebrew: Hesed; חֶסֶד, Grace; Emunah; אֱמוּנָה, Faithfulness; Mishpat; מִשְׁפָּט, Justice and Tsedaqah, צְדָקָה, Righteousness.

Micah 6:8 summarises covenant life: “To do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with your God.”  Any ideology or alliance must be measured against these covenantal standards.

The Divine Council Worldview: Nations and Powers

The Bible presents a layered reality in which earthly events are intertwined with spiritual governance. Key passages in this perspective include Deuteronomy 32:8-9 - the dispersal of the nations at Babel;  Psalm 82’s divine courtroom drama; Daniel 10’s majestic revealing of the Son of Man and Ephesians’ description of spiritual warfare (6:12).

Human systems are not spiritually neutral. Movements and alliances may reflect deeper alignments, either toward God’s order or toward rebellion.
 

Movements and alliances may reflect deeper alignments, either toward God’s order or toward rebellion.

Understanding the Red-Green Alliance

The term broadly describes cooperation between Progressive or leftist movements and Islamic groups or causes.
Some of the common areas of overlap may include anti-imperial or anti-Western critiques; advocacy for perceived marginalised communities, and shared political or activist goals – with possible combinations of these positions. However, this convergence is often pragmatic rather than philosophical, masking deeper differences.

Biblical Justice vs Ideological Justice

Biblical justice (Mishpat) is rooted in God’s character, as defined in Deuteronomy 32:4. This principally comprises His impartiality (Lev 19:15) - and His righteousness.

In comparison, ideological justice is often group-based, may readily shift with cultural frameworks and can easily detach from divine moral order.  As Amos 5:24 reminds us: “Let justice roll down like waters.” Justice must remain anchored in God, not in ideology.

Theological Differences with Islam

There are significant differences between Christianity and Islam, principally around the nature of God, Trinity versus strict unitarianism, and the identity of Jesus (Son of God versus only a ‘prophet’). It is also important to note the debate around whether the Issa of the Qu’ran is the biblical Jesus or not, as well as the all-important matter of salvation being gained through grace versus works-based frameworks.

John 14:6 establishes the central Christian claim: “No one comes to the Father except through me.” This creates an unavoidable theological boundary.
 

It is also important to note the debate around whether the Issa of the Qu’ran is the biblical Jesus or not ...

Areas of Concern within the Alliance

The greatest areas of concern in respect of this alliance are best described as moral relativism versus divine law; the purpose of instrumental partnerships, an unrelenting pressure on Christian witness and confusion between compassion and compromise. As Romans 12:2 reminds us, Christians must love all people while remaining rooted in truth.

Strategic Silence and Selective Emphasis: Managing Internal Contradictions

A defining challenge within this alliance is the presence of significant unresolved tensions, especially around moral and social issues.

The tensions are principally that whereas progressive frameworks invariably affirm areas such as gender equality and autonomy, LGBTQ+ inclusion and individual self-expression, we note that traditional Islamic frameworks, in many expressions, often uphold the polar opposites:  namely, distinct gender roles, restrictions on same-sex relationships and religious authority over personal autonomy.

These represent deeply divergent moral visions, yet they are routinely set to one side by the ‘Red’ team in order to combat the perceived threat of traditional Western perspectives.
 

We note that traditional Islamic frameworks, in many expressions, often uphold the polar opposites...

These tensions are managed in order to focus on the perceived enemy.  Techniques employed include:

• Issue compartmentalisation, with an emphasis placed on shared goals and disagreements being set aside.
• Additionally, they are reframed through Protection narratives, meaning that criticism may be muted to avoid contributing to prejudice.
• The issue of asymmetrical critique also arises, where selected moral critiques are applied unevenly across traditions.
• Finally, there is good old-fashioned coalition prioritisation, where political goals outweigh theological consistency.

Biblical Evaluation

Covenant faithfulness requires integrity: “He…speaks truth in his heart” (Ps 15:2). Truth cannot remain indefinitely compartmentalised without consequence.

Women’s dignity is biblically set out in the notions of equal image-bearing (Gen 1:27) and the emphasis on unity in Christ (Gal 3:28).  Similarly, sexual ethics are addressed in Genesis, relating to covenant marriage (2:24) and, pertaining to holiness, in 1 Thessalonians 4:3-5. This means that Christian teaching differs from both secular permissiveness and non-gospel legalism.
 

We should also remind ourselves of the biblical command to believers not to enter spiritually compromising alignments

Suppression of these differences will almost certainly result in moral confusion, fragile unity and selective justice. Isaiah 5:20 warns against this kind of moral inversion.

A Faithful Christian Response

So, what is a Christian response? I would suggest speaking the truth consistently. Defending dignity universally. A refusal to endorse false unity, and an unshakeable commitment to walk in love and clarity. 
 
We should also remind ourselves of the biblical command to believers not to enter spiritually compromising alignments (2 Cor 6:14). Our allegiance is ultimately to Christ, not to coalitions.

The Babel Pattern: Unity Without God

Genesis 11 shows humanity united, but in rebellion. This pattern reappears whenever unity is pursued apart from truth. Therefore, I would suggest that the Church must avoid both withdrawal and assimilation.  Instead, we are called to be salt and light; to speak the truth in love (Matt 5:13-16), and to proclaim Christ’s lordship Eph 4:15).

The Kingdom of God vs Earthly Alliances

When we consider God’s Kingdom, we should recognise that it transcends ideology (Gal 3:28); advances through the gospel and calls all to repentance (Acts 17:30).

In a call to discernment and love, 1 John teaches us to test the spirits (4:1). Christians must reject both hostility and naïveté.

Conclusion

The ‘Red-Green Alliance’ reflects deeper tensions about truth, justice and authority. Nowhere is this better demonstrated than in the Church of England’s decision to ‘hear’ Kairos II a couple of weeks ago. This document, which accuses Israel of ‘genocide’ and ‘apartheid’, notably reflects the ‘red-green alliance’.
 

Where alliances depend on suppressed truth, they remain unstable

Critics, such as the European Coalition for Israel and some Jewish leaders, argue that this coalition, a fusion of progressive-left, red and Islamist or anti-Zionist, green political agendas, has succeeded in mainstreaming a highly partisan narrative into major Western institutions. 

By passing this motion at the General Synod, these critics contend that the Church has allowed itself to be co-opted by this alliance, prioritising political activism dressed as theology while alienating the UK Jewish community and compromising its historic interfaith relation.

From a Hebraic covenant perspective, integrity and faithfulness are essential. From a divine council perspective, we recognise spiritual dynamics shaping human systems. Where alliances depend on suppressed truth, they remain unstable. The Church’s calling is higher:

1. To proclaim Christ.
2. To embody truth and love.
3. To remain faithful to God’s covenant.

Five Prayer Points

1. For Discernment: Lord, give us wisdom to see clearly through every ideology (James 1:5).
2. For Love Rooted in Truth: Help us love all people without compromising Your Word (1 Cor 13:6).
3. For the Church: Strengthen Your people to stand firm and proclaim the gospel boldly (Eph 6:10-11).
4. For the Nations: Bring justice and righteousness according to Your will (Ps 2:8)
5. For Revelation of Christ: Reveal Jesus as Lord to all peoples and draw many into Your Kingdom (Phil 2:9-11).